Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260936›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2026

Quantifying Visuomotor Maturation From Middle Childhood to Adolescence.

Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo, Lisa W Christian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ewa Niechwiej-SzwedoDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa W ChristianSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2022-03148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proficiency in fine motor skills improves significantly from childhood into adolescence; however, a longitudinal approach has not been used to examine the maturation trajectory of eye-hand coordination. Capturing individual performance changes by following the same cohort over time could offer unique insight into the developmental processes. This study assessed eye and hand kinematics during the execution of a prehension task in typically developing children (n = 17) tested at two time points: middle childhood (mean age: 9.14 years) and adolescence (mean age: 13.51 years). Results showed significant improvement in overall performance, which was due to shorter fixation duration, faster reaching duration, and shorter object placement duration. Temporal pattern of eye-hand coordination became more mature (adult-like) when picking up an object, indicating efficient coordination between the grasp and reach movements. Results demonstrate that kinematic analysis of prehension and eye-hand coordination provides a sensitive assay of the maturation trajectory of visuohaptic integration during prehension. These findings may support new methods for assessing fine motor skills and enhance the diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders linked to visuomotor impairments.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentChild DevelopmentEye MovementsHandMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalebinocular visioneye–hand coordinationeye movementsfine motor skillsprehension

Identifiers

PMID42260936
PMCPMC13247348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.