Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260902›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

Microliter-Scale Stereolithography Enables High-Resolution 3D Printing of Functional Extraction Sorbents.

Danial Shamsaei, Indunil U Chandrasekara, Emma L Katubig, Saxon J Ryan, Jared L Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danial ShamsaeiDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011,United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-4335
Indunil U ChandrasekaraDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011,United States.
Emma L KatubigDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011,United States.
Saxon J RyanDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011,United States.
Jared L AndersonDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011,United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6915-8752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the revolutionary potential of 3D printing in the analytical sciences, the large volume resin requirements of conventional stereolithography (SLA) platforms remain a significant barrier to the development of novel materials. This study reports a transformative modification to an SLA 3D printing system that enables the fabrication of small-diameter extraction sorbents using prepolymer volumes as low as 150 μL. The performance of SLA and liquid crystal display (LCD) printers, in terms of printing success rate and the reusability of prepolymer mixtures, was compared in the printing of ionic liquid (IL) and deep eutectic solvent (DES)-based mixtures. The SLA approach provided higher printing success rates across extraction sorbents at varied diameters used as fibers in solid-phase microextraction (SPME). The physicochemical properties of the prints─and their characterization, including the measurement of diameters and masses─as well as thermogravimetric analysis was determined. The resulting polymeric IL fibers were applied to the extraction of 15 analytes, including terpenes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkylphenols from aqueous samples, followed by direct thermal desorption by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Extraction optimization studies were conducted on the IL content, SPME fiber diameter, and extraction kinetics. Method validation for the extraction of terpenes yielded excellent linearity (

Identifiers

PMID42260902
PMCPMC13295097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.