Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260888›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2026

Changes in corneal aberrations and densitometry after diamond burr superficial keratectomy in post-traumatic recurrent corneal erosion: A retrospective observational study.

Han-Hao Tsai, Wei-Ting Ho

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Han-Hao TsaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Wei-Ting HoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4341-5137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent corneal erosion (RCE) is a painful condition characterized by repeated breakdown of the corneal epithelium, often requiring interventions like diamond burr superficial keratectomy (DBSK) to promote healing. While DBSK is an effective treatment, its impact on corneal optical properties remains insufficiently studied. This study aims to assess changes in corneal aberrations and densitometry after DBSK in RCE patients. This retrospective case-control study enrolled patients with unilateral RCE treated with DBSK between January 2022 and September 2023 were reviewed. The fellow eye served as an internal control. Corneal low- and high-order aberrations (LOAs and HOAs) and densitometry were analyzed preoperatively, early postoperatively (≤2 weeks), and late postoperatively (2 weeks-3 months). Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and ANOVA. Ten eyes from ten patients (mean age: 32.4 years) were analyzed. Preoperatively, study eyes had higher LOAs (P = .047) but similar HOAs and densitometry compared to fellow eyes. Following DBSK, LOAs and HOAs were significantly reduced in the early and late postoperative period, separately. Among the individual components of LOAs and HOAs, defocus showed a significant reduction in the early postoperative phase. Anterior densitometry increased transiently but returned to baseline level by 3 months. DBSK improves corneal regularity by reducing aberrations while inducing only transient haze. These findings support its efficacy and safety for RCE management.

Indexed as

CorneaCorneal Wavefront AberrationKeratectomyAdultCase-Control StudiesDensitometryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultcorneal densitometrydiamond burr superficial keratectomyhigh-order aberrationsrecurrent corneal erosion

Identifiers

PMID42260888
PMCPMC13246135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.