ArticleMedicine2026
Exploring racial-specific associations between the food inflammation index(FII) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) Prevalence: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2020.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Food Inflammation Index (FII) is a novel indicator for assessing the impact of diet on systemic inflammation. Unlike the Dietary Inflammation Index, which focuses on nutrients, the FII quantifies specific foods, providing greater applicability to real-world dietary assessments. To date, no study has examined the association between FII and the prevalence of Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between FII and MAFLD. This cross-sectional study included 25,067 individuals aged ≥ 20 years from the 1999 to 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between FII and MAFLD. Nonlinear associations between FII and MAFLD were examined using restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis. Subgroup analyses, interaction tests, and threshold effect analyses were conducted to assess differences across groups. The prevalence of MAFLD was 44.45%. FII was positively associated with MAFLD in all models (Models 1, 2, and 3, P < .05). In model 3, individuals in the highest tertile of FII had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.32] for MAFLD, compared to those in the lowest tertile. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests revealed sex- and race-specific associations between FII and MAFLD. Among non-Hispanic whites, the optimal FII threshold for preventing MAFLD was found to be -11.56. A lower FII was associated with a lower prevalence of MAFLD. The impact of FII on MAFLD prevalence was more pronounced among non-Hispanic whites compared to other racial groups. An FII score of < -11.56 for daily food intake was associated with a reduced risk of MAFLD in non-Hispanic whites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.