Observational studyMedicine2026
Healthy lifestyles and academic performance of Malaysian students: A cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
University students' lifestyle behaviors may influence academic performance, yet evidence from Malaysia remains limited. This observational cross-sectional study aimed to examine associations between healthy lifestyle behaviors and academic performance among Malaysian university students using an online questionnaire (April-June 2020) among Malaysian students aged 18 to 25 years. After exclusions, 431 respondents were analyzed. Self-reported lifestyle behaviors over the prior 4 weeks, including diet (meal regularity, skipping meals, meals/snacks per day, fast food, sweet beverages, coffee, water), sleep (hours, regularity, late bedtime, regular wake-up), physical activity (exercise), and substance use (tobacco). Academic performance measured by Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA), categorized as Low (<2.5), Medium (2.5-3.5; reference), and High (>3.5). Statistical analysis included: Descriptive statistics; analysis of variance (ANOVA)/χ2 or Fisher tests; Pearson correlation between CGPA (continuous) and behaviors; multinomial logistic regression reporting Relative Risk Ratios (RRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); least absolute shrinkage and selection operator as sensitivity analysis. Sleep hours correlated positively with CGPA, R = 0.16 (95% CI 0.067-0.251), P < .001; meals per day correlated positively, R = 0.15 (95% CI 0.056-0.241), P < .001; sweet-beverage intake correlated negatively, r=-0.12 (95% CI - 0.212 to - 0.026), P = .009. In multinomial models (reference: Medium CGPA), skipping meals was associated with Low CGPA, RRR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.98), P = .048; for High CGPA, overweight status RRR 0.46 (95% CI 0.21-0.99), P = .046; sweet beverages 3 times/day RRR 0.33 (95% CI 0.12-0.89), P = .020; 3 to 4 meals/day RRR 1.92 (95% CI 1.20-3.05), P = .002; 1 snack/day RRR 2.21 (95% CI 1.24-3.93), P = .003. Self-perceived good sleep quality was inversely associated with Medium and High CGPA. Healthy dietary patterns and appropriate weight are associated with better academic performance. University health promotion targeting regular meals and reduced sugary-drink intake may support academic success; longitudinal studies with objective sleep measures are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.