Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260835›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2026

Exploration and optimization of a respiratory outpatient triage model during the X disease epidemic: A retrospective observational study.

Chao Zhou, Xiao Feng, Hanhan Hong

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chao ZhouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao Feng
Hanhan Hong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preexamination triage is the critical first line of defense in outpatient settings. During epidemics like the X disease outbreak, traditional models often fail, and inaccurate triage leads to unfavorable patient outcomes and infection risks. This study aims to address the lack of specific, optimized triage workflows for respiratory epidemics. A retrospective observational study was conducted during the "Harmonious Mission-2022" deployment. An optimized 3-tier triage system - Entrance Security Check, Antigen Testing Area, and Preexamination Triage Area - integrated with a 3-level severity classification was implemented. Primary outcomes were triage efficiency, defined as mean daily patient throughput, and triage accuracy, defined as concordance between initial triage assessment and final diagnosis or disposition. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and operational constraints were identified through structured observational checklists. The optimized model processed a mean daily volume of 550.43 (standard deviation ± 284.13) individuals and achieved a triage accuracy rate of 98.3%. Key limiting factors included language barriers and environmental noise, which were addressed through standardized protocols and functional zoning. The structured 3-tier model demonstrated high operational efficiency and diagnostic concordance during the epidemic surge. These findings support the potential value of tiered task separation in strengthening preparedness for future respiratory outbreaks.

Indexed as

EpidemicsRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsTriageHumansOutpatientsRetrospective StudiesWorkflowemergency departmentepidemicinfection controloutpatient clinicpatient severitypreexamination triagerespiratory infectionstriagetriage accuracyworkflow optimizationX disease

Identifiers

PMID42260835
PMCPMC13246078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.