ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Replicability of Functional Brain Networks: A Study Through the Lens of Seven Resting-State Networks.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of brain networks is essential for improving our understanding of how the human brain functions. Functional connectivity (FC) analysis is a widely used approach for studying co-activating patterns among brain regions by estimating their temporal dependencies and constructing an undirected network. Data processing is critical before estimating a subject's functional network, but the absence of a standardized procedure serves as a source of heterogeneity in results, especially in multi-site studies. Commonly studied functional networks include the default mode, sensorimotor, visual, salience, dorsal attention, frontoparietal, and language networks. These networks are stable and still exhibit intrinsic activation when an individual is at rest, making them ideal networks to focus on for studying how processing choices affect the replicability of functional connectivity networks. We use the aforementioned seven networks to assess the impact of various processing choices, including preprocessing pipeline, band-pass filtering, and brain parcellation, on the replicability of functional connectivity estimates for multi-site resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE). Finally, we provide some practical recommendations for how researchers should proceed with processing choices in the face of these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.