ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
Inflammation induced by snake venoms optimizes envenomation.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 21-nanometer window: How endothelial pores reshape our understanding of antigen dissemination.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Snake envenomation activates the immune system through permeability-increasing factors that generate an acute vascular inflammatory response by opening large inflammation-activated pores (IAPs) in the microvasculature. These events facilitate the exudation of plasma from blood into body tissues. However we show that IAPs also allow macromolecules, including venom toxins, to flood directly into the bloodstream, even against an outflow of plasma solutes. Such inflammation-facilitated macromolecular absorption (IFMA) acts together with lymphatic absorption and has a physiological role in removing interstitial molecules, as evidenced by our dextran studies. IFMA will function in vascular absorption of interstitial molecules, potentially up to the radius of IAPs, which we determined to be 21 nm (95% confidence interval (CI) 18-24 nm). This absorption depends on factors, including the interstitial-vascular concentration gradient, the reflection coefficient of each molecule and microvascular pressure. Molecules absorbed will include snake venom toxins and various cellular breakdown products that arise during processes such as the inflammatory phase of wound healing. Most, if not all, venom toxins will be absorbed, as these typically have a hydrodynamic radius (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.