ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
Neurochemical Endpoints to Inform Early-Stage Trials of Spinocerebellar Ataxia 2 and 3 in a Multisite Setting.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNeurochemical levels measured by brain MR spectroscopy (MRS) have been proposed as endpoints for clinical trials in early-stage spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) trials. We tested their trial-readiness by quantifying neurochemicals in three affected brain regions in early-stage cohorts of SCA2 and SCA3, examining their reproducibility in both patients and controls in a multisite/multivendor setting, and determining if the same neurochemical outcomes can be used as endpoints for different SCA genotypes.
methodsSeventy-two participants (18 SCA2, mean Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) = 9 +/- 5; 25 SCA3, mean SARA = 10 +/- 6; 29 controls) underwent 3 T scans at four sites using scanners from two vendors and a harmonized MRS protocol. Scans were performed twice with a maximum 2-week interval. We measured neurochemical concentrations in the cerebellum, pons, and putamen, and assessed their within- and between-site reproducibility and associations with clinician- and patient-reported outcomes.
resultsTest-retest coefficients of variance were comparable across sites and vendors, but concentration estimates had to be adjusted for sites to account for small vendor-based biases. Total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA) and glutamate were lower, and myo-inositol (mI) and total creatine (tCr) were higher in the cerebellum and pons in both SCAs vs. controls. Pontine tNAA and mI, and cerebellar tNAA, mI, and glutamate levels were significantly different between SCA2 and SCA3, with strong effect sizes (|Cohen's d| = 1.1-2.1). The tNAA/tCr ratio had the strongest associations with clinical outcomes (|r| ≥ 0.5), with stronger associations in the cerebellum for SCA2 and in the pons for SCA3.
interpretationThese data support the use of tNAA and its ratios in a genotype-specific manner in early-stage SCA2 and SCA3 trials in the multisite/multivendor setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.