ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases2026
Life-threatening hemorrhagic shock due to intercostal artery perforation from a protruding staple leg after pulmonary wedge resection with a reinforced stapler: a case report.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary wedge resection is a lung-sparing procedure, with mechanical staplers enhancing surgical safety. Staple line reinforcement reduces air leakage; however, its effect on preventing mechanical vascular injury remains unclear. Staple-related vascular injuries rarely cause life-threatening complications. Here, we report a rare case of hemorrhagic shock caused by intercostal artery perforation from a protruding staple leg following thoracoscopic wedge resection with a reinforced stapler, which was likely triggered by lung collapse and re-expansion. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old man underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection of right segment 6 for suspected metachronous lung adenocarcinoma using a reinforced stapler with a gold cartridge. The surgery was uneventful. On postoperative day (POD) 1, accidental chest drain removal caused lung collapse. After drain reinsertion and lung re-expansion on POD 2, the patient developed hemorrhagic shock on POD 3. Emergency thoracotomy revealed massive intrathoracic hemorrhage from the eighth intercostal artery due to a staple leg protruding through the reinforcement and perforating the artery during lung inflation. Hemostasis was achieved using electrocautery and artery ligation, followed by removal of the protruding staple and additional staple line reinforcement. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on POD 10.
conclusionsMechanical vascular injury due to staple protrusion can occur despite reinforced staplers. Lung collapse and re-expansion may alter the spatial relationship between the staple line and adjacent chest wall vessels, thereby increasing arterial injury risk. Careful staple line inspection, appropriate cartridge selection based on tissue thickness, and chest drain management are essential for preventing this rare complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.