ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Code-free automated machine learning for OCT-based classification of vitreoretinal interface diseases.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiation of vitreoretinal interface disorders on optical coherence tomography (OCT) relies on expert interpretation and can be challenging in borderline cases. Automated machine learning (AutoML) platforms may enable clinician-driven artificial intelligence development without coding expertise. This study evaluated the performance of a code-free AutoML approach for OCT-based classification.
methodsIn this cross-sectional image classification study, 434 OCT B-scans from publicly available datasets were manually labeled into four categories: epiretinal membrane (ERM), lamellar macular hole (LMH), full-thickness macular hole (MH), and normal retina. Images were uploaded to a cloud-based AutoML platform (Google Cloud Vertex AI), which automatically performed data splitting (80% training, 10% validation, 10% test), model training, and optimization. Performance was assessed using precision, recall, average precision, and confusion matrix analysis.
resultsThe model achieved an overall average precision of 0.988, with precision and recall of 97.6%. MH and normal retina were classified with perfect precision and recall (100%). ERM showed high precision (100%) with slightly reduced recall (92.9%), while LMH demonstrated complete recall (100%) with lower precision (83.3%). Misclassifications were limited to anatomically related entities.
conclusionsCode-free AutoML enables accurate OCT-based classification of vitreoretinal interface disorders using a clinician-driven workflow. This approach may facilitate broader adoption of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology and support rapid clinical research prototyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.