ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Offshore wind farm avoidance by a discard-feeding seabird is independent of local fishing activity.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Offshore wind farm avoidance by a discard-feeding seabird is independent of local fishing activity.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Offshore wind farms are increasing rapidly in number and scale, presenting potential risks for seabirds. Some seabirds actively avoid offshore wind farms, whereas others are attracted to them. Both avoidance and attraction can have detrimental effects, including habitat loss and increased collision mortality. Because commercial fishing is typically restricted within wind farm boundaries, apparent avoidance by discard-feeding species may reflect attraction to nearby fishing activities rather than actual wind farm avoidance Here we studied the temporal variation in avoidance and attraction of 58 GPS-tracked Lesser Black-backed Gulls (Larus fuscus) to both the offshore wind farm and fishing activity within the foraging range from their breeding colony. If apparent avoidance of offshore wind farms was caused by an attraction to nearby fisheries, we expected a lower selection strength of the offshore wind farm during weekdays when fishing activity is much higher compared to weekends. We used a step selection analysis to estimate relative selection strength including individual variability and tested if the selection strength for wind farms and fishing activity differed between the pre-breeding, breeding and post-breeding periods, between sexes, and between weekdays and weekends. At the population level, gulls avoided the offshore wind farm during most periods and selected areas with fishing activity compared to areas without. The selection strength of wind farms and attraction to fisheries varied substantially between individuals, with several males being attracted to the wind farm during the breeding and post-breeding period. Variation between individuals in avoidance of offshore wind farms varied most during the breeding period. The attraction to fishing activity did not differ between periods and sex. Fishing intensity was four times lower during the weekends than during weekdays. However, we found no support that gulls differed in wind farm avoidance between weekdays and weekends, suggesting that avoidance is not primarily driven by fishing exclusion within wind farms. This research contributes valuable empirical data to improve the biological realism of Collision Risk Models by demonstrating that individual variability in avoidance behaviour warrants the inclusion of behavioural heterogeneity in these models rather than assuming uniform population responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.