Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260660›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

Enhancing the Health of NHS Staff: eTHOS-a randomised controlled pilot trial of an employee health screening clinic for NHS staff compared with usual care to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism.

Rachel Adams, Rachel E Jordan, Alisha Maher, Peymané Adab, Tim Barrett, Sheriden Bevan, Lucy Cooper, Ingrid DuRand, Florence Edwards, Pollyanna Hardy and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Rachel AdamsHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Rachel E JordanDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. r.e.jordan@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-6883
Alisha MaherBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Peymané AdabDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Tim BarrettBirmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Sheriden BevanBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Lucy CooperBirmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH, UK.
Ingrid DuRandHereford County Hospital, Stonebow Road, Hereford, HR1 2ER, UK.
Florence EdwardsDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Pollyanna HardyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Ciara HarrisWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Nicola HeneghanSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Natalie IvesBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Kate JollyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sue JowettDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Tom MarshallDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Margaret O'HaraPublic and Patient Involvement and Engagement, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Christopher PoynerTHRIVE Mental Health Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Mental Health , University of Worcester, Worcester, WR2 6AJ, UK.
Kiran K RaiDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Hugh RickardsBirmingham Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Steven SadhraBirmingham Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sarah TearneBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Gareth WaltersDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Elizabeth SapeySchool of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit 17/42/42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaff sickness absence incurs high costs to the NHS and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Mental and musculoskeletal ill-health are the main causes, with cardiovascular risk factors also common. We tested the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a staff health screening clinic (SHSC) in reducing sickness absenteeism and presenteeism.

methodsIndividually randomised controlled pilot trial of a SHSC compared with usual care recruiting employees from four English NHS hospitals. Those in the intervention arm were assessed by a nurse using electronic database-driven screening for musculoskeletal, mental and cardiovascular health. Screen positives were given advice and/or referral to services according to UK guidelines. Three co-primary outcomes formed the stop-go criteria: recruitment, referrals, and attendance at referred services. Secondary outcomes included: generalisability, screening results, individual referrals required/attended, health behaviours, acceptability/feasibility of processes, indication of contamination, costs, health-related quality of life, self-reported and employee records of absenteeism. Process evaluation included interviews with participants, intervention delivery staff and service providers. Quantitative analyses used descriptive statistics with framework analysis for qualitative data. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, follow-up was restricted to 6 months and acceptance of referral during the screening assessment used as proxy for attendance.

resultsDespite recruitment rates during the truncated timeframe indicating potential to reach target, the final proportion recruited of 314 consented/3788 invited (8.3%) was lower than anticipated, and those recruited were not fully representative of the hospital staff population. 236/314 were randomised. Of 118 allocated to the intervention arm, screening identified 57 (48.3%) eligible for referral, with 18 (31.6%) accepting the referral. Process evaluation demonstrated that the electronic database-driven screening intervention and data collection system was efficient, promoting good fidelity. The intervention could benefit from more personalisation, better understanding of local context, longer training, and better integration with referral services.

conclusionsWe have identified a clinical need and perceived benefit for a SHSC. Delivery was feasible and electronic data capture successful. The three stop-go criteria were red (recruitment), green (referral), and amber (attendance); therefore, the Trial Oversight Committee recommended that a full-scale trial should proceed, but with modifications to adapt to local context and adopt processes to engage better with underserved communities.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN10237475, registered 09/12/2019, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10237475.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismEmployee healthHealthcare workersHealth screeningNHSOccupational healthPresenteeismRandomised controlled pilot trial

Identifiers

PMID42260660
PMCPMC13491788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.