ArticleTropical medicine and health2026
Gender bias in fertility choices: how son preference increases the risk of short birth intervals in India.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShort birth intervals are a persistent public health issue that elevate maternal and child health risks in India, where high patriarchy and son preference influence reproductive health outcomes among women. While prior research has not isolated or quantified the contribution of son preference to short birth interval (SBI). This study explores the impact of son preference on SBI in India. DATA AND
methodsUsing nationally representative data from India's National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-21), we analyzed 117,135 married women aged 15-49 with at least two consecutive live births. We employed logistic regression models to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for SBI. Furthermore, the Fairlie decomposition technique was also applied to quantify the contribution of observed individual, household, and community-level characteristics in the differential length of birth interval among son preference and non-son preference women.
resultsWomen who had son preference had 16% higher odds of SBI (AOR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.12-1.20). The Fairlie decomposition revealed that 78.4% of this disparity was explained by measurable factors. Household wealth was the dominant contributor (64.7%), followed by fertility desire (30.4%), maternal BMI (16.3%), and household size (15.9%). Notably, maternal education and regional context acting as equalizing forces, reducing the explained gap by 18.8% and 24.8%, functioning as protective suppressors, however, 21.6% of the disparity remained unexplained, suggesting unmeasured patriarchal norms and reproductive coercion mechanisms.
conclusionSon preference's influence on SBI in India is not rooted solely in cultural tradition but is statistically explained by observed characteristics. Policies that enhance women's education, economic security, and access to family planning, especially in high-patriarchy regions, can disrupt the association between son preference and SBI. Integrating gender-transformative approaches into India's reproductive health programs is essential to advance both maternal health (SDG 3) and gender equality (SDG 5).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.