Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260623›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026

Between gods and green: ritual plant use of traditional festivals in the Chaoshan region, China.

Jiating Wang, Shihong Zhang, Fengcheng Deng, Xinhao Lin, Dipak Khadka, Lili Zhong, Bowei Ma, Mingyan Ding, Shiou Yih Lee, Yang Yu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jiating WangGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Shihong ZhangGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Fengcheng DengGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Xinhao LinGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Dipak KhadkaGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Lili ZhongGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Bowei MaGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Mingyan Ding, Shunde Polytechnic University, , Foshan, 528333, China.
Shiou Yih LeeFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, INTI International University, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia.
Yang YuFaculty of Nursing, Shinawatra University, 12150, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Dafang CuiGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China. cuidf@scau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-8425
Binsheng LuoLushan Botanical Garden, Jiangxi Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiujiang, 332801, China. luobins@lsbg.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-176X
Shi ShiGuangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China. shis@scau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-6732

Funding

the Academy of Chinese Intangible Cultural Heritage 2025 Social Science Planning Project FYY2025YB40the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32300325the "Xuncheng Talents" Program of Jiujiang City No. JJXC2023136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Chaoshan region in Lingnan, South China, is known for its dense festival calendars and household-based ritual practices in which plants serve both practical and symbolic roles. Plant-centered documentation of ritual practices in this Han Chinese setting remains limited. This study documents ritual plants used in Chaoshan festival practices and examines their cultural meanings and the transmission of knowledge.

methodsWe conducted ethnobotanical fieldwork between October 2023 and October 2025 across three Chaoshan cities, using semi-structured interviews and participatory observation. A total of 100 key informants were interviewed. Ritual plant importance and cultural salience were assessed using the Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) and the Cultural Importance Index (CII), and knowledge differences across demographic groups were tested statistically.

resultsWe documented 25 traditional festivals spanning 11 months and recorded 60 ritual plant species (52 genera, 31 families), with cultivated taxa dominating (58 species, 96.67%). Fabaceae and Poaceae were the most represented families (6 species each, 10%). Punica granatum and Citrus reticulata ranked highest in both RFC and CII. Six cultural connotations were identified, with prayer for well-being and prosperity being the most prevalent (41 species, 68.33%). Plant selection was primarily associated with biological characteristics (39 species, 65%) and homophony (27 species, 45%). Knowledge transmission was reported mainly through oblique pathways, and women were the principal practitioners and knowledge holders. Reported knowledge differed significantly across age groups.

conclusionsRitual plant selection in Chaoshan follows shared local logics, especially homophony and salient plant traits. Transmission is closely tied to household participation and kinship roles, and the combination of low stated intention to pass knowledge to the next generation with clear-age differences suggests that continuity is under pressure.

Indexed as

Ceremonial BehaviorEthnobotanyAdultChinaFemaleHumansKnowledgeMiddle AgedChaoshan regionCultural heritageEthnobotanyHan ChineseKnowledge transmissionRitual plantsTraditional festivals

Identifiers

PMID42260623
PMCPMC13474850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.