ArticleTropical medicine and health2026
Unpacking the black box of training effectiveness: a structural equation modelling analysis.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe health workforce shortage in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains a critical challenge. The quality of health personnel impacts population health, particularly in LMICs. While development partners invest in training programmes to improve quality, evaluation of these programmes remains rare, with limited evidence on the structural and contextual factors influencing outcomes. This study aims to evaluate Japan's Official Development Assistance (ODA) capacity-building training programmes conducted in Japan for LMIC health workforces and to identify key structural factors to guide future workforce development strategies.
methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted from January to June 2023 in the Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mongolia. A total of 148 health professionals who had participated in ODA training programmes between 2013 and 2020 were included. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to 97 questionnaire items developed based on the training transfer literature, followed by Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and structural equation modelling (SEM) with robust estimation.
resultsEFA identified six latent factors related to training effectiveness. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests showed that five factors-Feasible Action Plan, Collaborative Work Environment, Encouraging Learning Environment, Job-aligned Training and Readiness, and Altruistic Desire-were significantly associated with training effectiveness. During SEM refinement, two factors (Limited Authority and Altruistic Desire) were excluded due to non-significant effects or construct instability. The final model retained four factors, with Feasible Action Plan showing the strongest direct effect on training effectiveness (β = 0.72, p < 0.001). Collaborative Work Environment influenced training effectiveness indirectly through Job-aligned Training and Readiness and Feasible Action Plan. The model explained 45% of the variance in training effectiveness.
conclusionsTraining effectiveness, defined as self-reported application of acquired knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the workplace, is shaped by interrelated factors operating before, during, and after training. The Feasible Action Plan emerged as the strongest direct predictor, highlighting the importance of translating learning into concrete and implementable actions. Collaborative and supportive workplace environments further facilitate this process. These findings underscore the importance of a holistic, process-oriented approach to ODA capacity-building training to enhance training transfer and sustain impact in LMIC settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.