ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Meta-ERS: an exposome-based risk score using non-genetic factors to guide osteoporosis prevention.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, yet the relative contribution of the exposome remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically identify non-genetic exposures related to osteoporosis and develop an exposome risk score (ERS) to evaluate individual osteoporosis susceptibility.
methodsWe conducted an exposome-wide analysis of 477,792 UK Biobank participants to identify key exposures associated with osteoporosis. The selected exposures were combined into a weighted Meta-ERS and validated in the Scotland/Wales cohort. The Meta-ERS was further compared with polygenic risk scores (PRS) and linked to plasma proteomics to explore underlying biological pathways.
resultsWe identified 41 independent non-genetic exposures spanning socioeconomic status, mental health, sleep, diet, smoking, physical activity, environment, and marital status, with socioeconomic status and mental health emerging as the most significant drivers. Based on the identified exposures, we constructed eight domain-specific exposure risk scores and integrated them into a weighted Meta-ERS. The Meta-ERS (R
conclusionsThe Meta-ERS facilitates the quantification of individual osteoporosis risk and identifies modifiable exposures for targeted prevention. Its application can enable personalized risk stratification and guide lifestyle or environmental interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.