ArticleBMC palliative care2026
"Reconciling"- conceptualising the grieving process of family members involved in assisted dying: a grounded formal theory.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe death of a loved one invariably triggers a complex constellation of profound emotional, psychological, and physical grief reactions. While theoretical frameworks for understanding the grieving process are well-established, the advent of assisted dying presents a novel and under-examined context for grief and bereavement. Thus, this study sought to generate a theory explaining the grieving process of family members involved in assisted dying.
methodsA grounded formal theory approach was employed. Extensive systematic searches were undertaken across various four databases for eligible qualitative studies. Constant comparison was employed to iteratively refine emerging codes and categories.
resultsFifteen (15) qualitative studies were retained. Reconciling, emerged as central to conceptualising the grieving process associated with assisted dying reflecting four interconnected categories: navigating ambivalence, anticipating, transitioning, and navigating the aftermath. This process is characterised as a complex, iterative, and often non-linear proactive journey of meaning-making, through which families strive to integrate the profound dichotomies. Reconciling, as a mid-range theory, extends existing grief models by demonstrating that bereavement in assisted dying involves a proactive, ethically charged negotiation of autonomy, suffering, and relational responsibility; dimensions not accounted for in stage-based or oscillation models.
conclusionThe grieving process in assisted dying is best understood as Reconciling, a dynamic, iterative negotiation of autonomy, suffering, love, and loss. Families move through ambivalence, anticipation, transition, and aftermath in ways that blend emotional complexity with profound meaning-making. This theory offers a transferable framework to understand and support families navigating this ethically charged form of bereavement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.