Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260550›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Development and interpretability of a machine learning-derived model for the identification of latent prostate cancer in patients initially diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study.

Sheng Liang, Yuansi Lao, Peiling Ma, Changhuan Shang, Rukun Li, Zengfu Li, Yongtao Le, Wenhui Cao, Chunling Chen, Ke Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sheng Liang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Yuansi Lao *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Peiling MaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Changhuan ShangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Rukun LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Zengfu LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Yongtao LeDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Wenhui CaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Chunling ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Ke LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Hengzhou City People's Hospital, Hengzhou, Guangxi, China.
Liqing LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.71, Hedi Road, Nanning, China. liliqinglily@163.com.

Funding

2023 Medical and Health Technology Innovation Research Program of Hengzhou City H20231201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is characterized by pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity and multifocality, presenting ongoing challenges for early and precise diagnosis. In clinical practice, a substantial proportion of patients initially diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are subsequently found to harbor latent PCa during follow-up. However, current prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening lacks the specificity required to resolve this diagnostic overlap. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model as an adjunct to PSA testing for identifying latent PCa in patients initially diagnosed with BPH.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized data from 1,071 patients to develop a machine learning framework aimed at identifying pre-existing occult PCa diagnosed at least 6 months after the initial BPH assessment. The cohort was partitioned into training (70%) and test (30%) subsets. Within the training set, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) was utilized to identify a concise biomarker signature. Six machine learning algorithms were evaluated: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was facilitated through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) analysis.

resultsA concise four-biomarker signature comprising total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), red blood cell count (RBC), and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) was identified. The MLP and LR models exhibited high diagnostic performance, with test AUROC values of 0.949 and 0.946, respectively.

conclusionThis research developed and internally validated an interpretable machine learning framework designed to complement traditional PSA screening methodologies. The tool is intended exclusively for research purposes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenBenign prostatic hyperplasiaBiomarkersMachine learningModel interpretabilityProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenRisk stratificationSHAP

Identifiers

PMID42260550
PMCPMC13474970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.