ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Development and interpretability of a machine learning-derived model for the identification of latent prostate cancer in patients initially diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is characterized by pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity and multifocality, presenting ongoing challenges for early and precise diagnosis. In clinical practice, a substantial proportion of patients initially diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are subsequently found to harbor latent PCa during follow-up. However, current prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening lacks the specificity required to resolve this diagnostic overlap. This study aimed to develop and internally validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model as an adjunct to PSA testing for identifying latent PCa in patients initially diagnosed with BPH.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized data from 1,071 patients to develop a machine learning framework aimed at identifying pre-existing occult PCa diagnosed at least 6 months after the initial BPH assessment. The cohort was partitioned into training (70%) and test (30%) subsets. Within the training set, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) was utilized to identify a concise biomarker signature. Six machine learning algorithms were evaluated: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Model interpretability was facilitated through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOWESS) analysis.
resultsA concise four-biomarker signature comprising total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), red blood cell count (RBC), and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) was identified. The MLP and LR models exhibited high diagnostic performance, with test AUROC values of 0.949 and 0.946, respectively.
conclusionThis research developed and internally validated an interpretable machine learning framework designed to complement traditional PSA screening methodologies. The tool is intended exclusively for research purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.