Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260537›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

The role of cognitive approaches in nursing students' learning experiences: a quasi-experimental study cognitive learning approaches in nursing.

Gizem Açıkgöz, Zuhal Bahar, Cennet Çiriş Yıldız, Burcu Özkan, Meryem Erceylan, Güzin Ünlü Suvari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gizem AçıkgözDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Kent University, Cendere Street No:24, Istanbul, Kagithane, 34406, Turkey. gzmacikgoz@gmail.com.
Zuhal BaharDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cennet Çiriş YıldızDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burcu ÖzkanDepartment of Operating Room Services, Vocational School of Health Services, Fenerbahçe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Meryem ErceylanDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, İstinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Güzin Ünlü SuvariDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi 686E-Y2BB-8UEY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive learning approaches are important in nursing education because they support analytical thinking, decision-making, and self-regulated learning processes. Competencies such as problem solving, critical thinking, peer support, self-directed learning readiness, and locus of control may contribute to nursing students' academic and professional development. Unlike interventions focusing on a single student-centered teaching strategy or isolated competency, this study examined an integrated cognitive learning program that brought together five learning-related domains through structured conceptual explanation, guided questioning, and group discussion. This study aimed to examine changes in selected learning-related competencies following this integrated cognitive learning intervention among first-year nursing students.

methodsThis non-randomized quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study with experimental and control groups was conducted at two foundation universities in Istanbul, Türkiye. Group allocation was conducted at the institutional level, with one university assigned to the experimental group and the other to the control group. A total of 114 first-year nursing students completed the study, including 69 in the experimental group and 45 in the control group. The intervention consisted of a structured five-week online educational program comprising five separate 120-minute sessions, with one session delivered each week and each session focusing on a different cognitive learning domain. Data were collected using validated instruments assessing problem solving, critical thinking, peer support, self-directed learning readiness, and locus of control. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, within-group and between-group comparisons, and ANCOVA adjusted for baseline scores.

resultsThe intervention was associated with changes in several learning-related outcomes. In the experimental group, self-directed learning readiness increased and showed the clearest adjusted between-group difference. Critical thinking showed a less marked decline than that observed in the control group, although the adjusted between-group difference was not statistically significant. Problem-Solving Inventory scores also changed over time, but these findings require cautious interpretation in view of the scoring characteristics of the instrument. Peer support decreased in the experimental group, and no significant adjusted between-group difference was observed for this outcome. Findings related to locus of control were also mixed and were not supported after adjustment for baseline differences between groups.

conclusionsThe clearest finding was observed for self-directed learning readiness, suggesting that short-term cognitively oriented educational input may be particularly relevant to students' readiness for autonomous learning. Findings for problem solving, critical thinking, peer support, and locus of control were more mixed, indicating that learning-related outcomes may respond differently to condensed online interventions. By examining multiple domains within a single structured framework, this study contributes preliminary evidence on the domain-specific nature of cognitive learning interventions in nursing education.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Cognitive learningCritical thinkingLocus of controlNursing educationPeer supportProblem solvingSelf-directed learning

Identifiers

PMID42260537
PMCPMC13551986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.