ReviewBMC health services research2026
Rehabilitation physical activity service systems for people with disabilities in Korea, the United States, Germany, and Japan: paradigm review and policy directions for Korea.
Review in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdults with disabilities engage in substantially less physical activity and experience elevated risks of secondary conditions relative to adults without disabilities. This narrative comparative review examined how rehabilitation physical activity systems are organized across governmental, healthcare, and community service structures in Korea, the United States, Germany, and Japan, and derived policy directions for addressing fragmentation, access limitations, and service sustainability in Korea.
methodsA narrative, policy-oriented comparative review integrating peer-reviewed studies, laws, and official documents was conducted between January 2010 and November 2025.
resultsKorea is transitioning toward a rehabilitation exercise-and-sport delivery model supported by rehabilitation sports public services and data-driven community platforms, yet governance fragmentation and limited community capacity persist. Across the four countries, a concurrent shift toward biopsychosocial and rights-based paradigms, stronger community anchoring, workforce professionalization, and increasing digitalization was identified, although the institutional forms and implementation gaps differed by country.
conclusionsKorea should strengthen an integrated rehabilitation physical activity system that expands sustained opportunities for physical activity and exercise through coordinated community pathways, stable public financing, disability-competent workforce development, interoperable data systems, and co-production with people with disabilities and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.