ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Factors contributing to electronic prescribing errors in healthcare settings: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedication errors from illegible or incomplete handwritten prescriptions can compromise patient safety and increase costs. While E-prescribing aims to reduce errors through improved prescription quality and legibility, these systems can potentially introduce different types of medication errors due to various technical, environmental, and human factors. This qualitative study analyzed the factors contributing to E-prescribing errors at Iranian Social Security Organization outpatient centers.
methodsQualitative content analysis was performed on data from interviews with 10 physicians, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. The participants had at least 6 months of experience using the E-prescribing. The interview data were coded until saturation and analyzed via the methods of Graneheim and Lundman.
resultThis qualitative study identified four main categories of error sources: system, human, organizational, and medication-related factors. In the system domain, technical challenges such as problematic autocomplete features for drug names emerged as significant contributors to selection errors. Human factors, particularly prescriber fatigue and reduced physician-patient interaction time, were found to compromise prescribing accuracy. At the organizational level, insufficient training programs and inadequate staffing levels hindered effective system utilization. Medication factors, including look-alike drug names and complex dosing regimens, further increased error risks.
conclusionThe findings revealed that E-prescribing errors stem from multiple interacting factors, affecting both clinician and non-clinician prescribers similarly. While system design improvements and enhanced user training are crucial, addressing the broader sociotechnical context is essential for error reduction. A balanced approach incorporating standardized protocols, integrated decision support systems, and continuous professional development is recommended to enhance system usability and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.