ArticleBMC nursing2026
The effect of tele-interventions on family caregiver burden: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily caregiving is often associated with a significant physical and psychological burden. Tele‑interventions have increasingly been used to support family caregivers; however, existing studies report inconsistent findings. This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to synthesize evidence on the effect of tele‑interventions on family caregiver burden across different patient populations.
methodsThis systematic review and meta‑analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and included randomized controlled trials published from 2015 to 2025. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Twenty‑three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 17 were eligible for meta‑analysis. Pooled, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were conducted utilizing Stata software, with results reported as standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals.
resultsMost tele‑interventions were conducted among caregivers of individuals with neurological conditions, with web‑based formats and educational components being the most common intervention features. Seventeen randomized controlled trials were included in the meta‑analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that tele‑interventions were associated with a greater reduction in family caregiver burden compared with usual care; however, substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (SMD = -0.39; 95% CI: -0.76 to - 0.01; p < 0.001; I² = 94.50%). Subgroup analyses based on disorder and intervention modality and content were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity and should be interpreted as exploratory. Larger standardized mean differences were observed in studies involving caregivers of individuals with chronic conditions compared with other disease groups, and in interventions delivered via mobile applications.
conclusionThis systematic review and meta‑analysis suggests that tele‑interventions may reduce family caregiver burden, although the findings are limited by substantial heterogeneity across studies. Therefore, further well‑designed randomized controlled trials with standardized outcome measures and diverse caregiver populations are needed to clarify the effectiveness of tele‑interventions and to identify the contexts in which they may be most beneficial. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.