SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Local curcumin/turmeric-derived delivery adjunctive to scaling and root planing for periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocally delivered curcumin and turmeric-derived formulations have been proposed as adjuncts to scaling and root planing (SRP), but the evidence is difficult to interpret because trials differ by design, comparator, population, formulation and follow-up.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other relevant sources from inception to 18 May 2026. Search terms covered curcumin, turmeric, curcuminoids, Curcuma longa, periodontitis, periodontal pockets, scaling and root planing, non-surgical periodontal therapy, and local or subgingival drug delivery. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2. Random-effects meta-analyses were stratified by study design, comparator type and population, and certainty of evidence for the primary outcome was assessed using GRADE.
resultsThe search identified 71 database records and 8 ClinicalTrials.gov registry records. Twenty-nine randomized or quasi-randomized clinical reports were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 27 reports contributed extractable PPD data to at least one quantitative analysis. In systemically healthy participants with inactive controls, adjunctive curcumin/turmeric-derived delivery was associated with modest PPD reduction in parallel-arm studies (6 studies; MD -0.67 mm, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.22; I2 = 79.6%) and split-mouth studies (15 studies; MD -0.46 mm, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.24; I2 = 87.5%). Prediction intervals crossed the null in both analyses, and the certainty of evidence for PPD reduction was rated as low because of risk of bias and inconsistency. Active-comparator analyses were highly heterogeneous and exploratory.
conclusionsLocally delivered curcumin/turmeric-derived formulations used adjunctively with SRP may provide a modest improvement in PPD reduction; however, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of substantial heterogeneity and methodological limitations. The certainty and clinical applicability of the evidence remain limited by small trials, high heterogeneity, incomplete reporting, variable formulations and geographically clustered evidence. Current evidence does not establish dose-response, formulation superiority, safety, or replacement of chlorhexidine, antibiotics or other conventional antimicrobial agents. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420261333717, Registered on 6 March 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.