Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260421›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Exploring the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and associated factors among pregnant women attending tertiary antenatal hospitals in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional survey-based approach.

Mahmuda Tasnim, Nazifa Tabassum Tasnim, Aklima Sultana, Nadia Sultana Deen, Fahim Kabir Monjurul Haque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mahmuda Tasnim *Department of Microbiology, BRAC University, Kha 224 Bir Uttam Rafiqul Islam Avenue, Dhaka, Merul Badda, 1212, Bangladesh.
Nazifa Tabassum Tasnim *Department of Microbiology, BRAC University, Kha 224 Bir Uttam Rafiqul Islam Avenue, Dhaka, Merul Badda, 1212, Bangladesh.
Aklima SultanaChattogram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College Agrabad, Chattogram, 4100, Bangladesh.
Nadia Sultana DeenDepartment of Microbiology, BRAC University, Kha 224 Bir Uttam Rafiqul Islam Avenue, Dhaka, Merul Badda, 1212, Bangladesh.
Fahim Kabir Monjurul HaqueDepartment of Microbiology, BRAC University, Kha 224 Bir Uttam Rafiqul Islam Avenue, Dhaka, Merul Badda, 1212, Bangladesh. fahim.haque@bracu.ac.bd.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a form of hyperglycemia which is first diagnosed during pregnancy. South Asian women show a higher prevalence of GDM, which has been associated with both genetic and lifestyle factors.

objectivesThis survey-based cross-sectional study aimed to estimate the prevalence of GDM among pregnant women attending tertiary healthcare facilities for antenatal care and to identify factors independently associated with GDM.

methodsA total of 250 pregnant women at 18-40 weeks of gestation attending tertiary healthcare facilities in the Dhaka, Chattogram, and Mymensingh divisions were selected using a non-probability consecutive sampling approach. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering demographic, obstetric, clinical, and lifestyle factors after obtaining informed consent from all participants. GDM status was determined based on a one-step 75 g OGTT test in accordance with national and WHO criteria.

resultsThe prevalence of GDM was 14% in this study. Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test were used for initial comparisons. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate crude odds ratios (cOR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for factors associated with GDM. In the adjusted analysis, obesity class II (aOR: 9.929, 95% CI: 1.174-83.983, p = 0.035) and obesity class III (aOR: 26.945, 95% CI: 1.101-659.624, p = 0.044) were significantly associated with increased odds of GDM. However, the wide confidence intervals suggest limited precision of these estimates. Parental history of diabetes (aOR: 3.079, 95% CI: 1.275-7.432, p = 0.012), betel quid chewing (aOR: 2.689, 95% CI: 1.010-7.160, p = 0.048), and sugar-sweetened beverage intake (aOR: 3.827, 95% CI: 1.649-8.880, p = 0.002) were also significantly associated with increased odds of GDM. In contrast, maternal age (aOR: 0.996, 95% CI: 0.911-1.088, p = 0.922), pre-obesity (aOR: 2.238, 95% CI: 0.461-10.864, p = 0.317), obesity class I (aOR: 4.515, 95% CI: 0.921-22.139, p = 0.063) and oral contraceptive use (aOR: 2.136, 95% CI: 0.871-5.240, p = 0.097) were not significantly associated with GDM after adjustment. The first pregnancy was associated with lower odds of GDM in the crude analysis; however, this association was no longer statistically significant after adjustment (aOR: 0.382, 95% CI: 0.118-1.241, p = 0.110).

conclusionThese findings highlight the multifactorial nature of GDM, with both genetic susceptibility and modifiable lifestyle behaviours contributing to its development. Targeted awareness initiatives focusing on dietary behaviours, particularly reducing the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, may be beneficial in similar populations, alongside early screening of women with a family history of diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansLogistic ModelsObesityOdds RatioPregnancyPrenatal CarePrevalenceRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersYoung AdultAssociated FactorsDiabetesGestational Diabetes MellitusPregnancyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID42260421
PMCPMC13463646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.