ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Navigating complexity: understanding the experiences, motivations and challenges of conducting research with perinatal individuals who use opioids and other substances.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite increased opioid use (OU) among individuals of child-bearing age, pregnant and postpartum individuals with OU, and the experiences of these individuals and scientists with related expertise, are notably absent in scientific literature and discourse. The HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study, a large, longitudinal, U.S.-based consortium project, aims to understand how brain and child development is shaped by various adversities and protective factors, including prenatal exposure to opioids and other substances. Given the persistent challenges of engaging pregnant and postpartum individuals with OU in longitudinal research, this qualitative study, conducted during the pilot phase of HBCD, aimed to better understand barriers, motivators, and best practices to recruitment and retention of this underrepresented population.
methodsParticipants included perinatal individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) (n = 6) and researchers with expertise in perinatal substance use (n = 22). Semi-structured interviews were conducted and thematically analyzed to identify effective strategies for recruitment, engagement, and retention in longitudinal research. Knowledge and comfort with neurodevelopmental research procedures was also explored.
resultsKey themes emerging from both participant groups included the centrality of trust and nonjudgmental relationships between research teams and participants, transparency about research aims and procedures, and meaningful connections to emotional, educational, and logistical supports. Respondents emphasized the value of research staff continuity, flexible study designs, and opportunities for participants to share their stories and receive feedback. Although participants generally expressed comfort with infant neuroimaging and biospecimen collection, misunderstandings about these methods underscored the need for thorough, accessible education.
conclusionsFindings highlight the importance of responsive, ethically grounded research practices to strengthen research on opioid use in a manner responsive to the needs of affected populations. Successful engagement requires creative and adaptable study designs, ancillary supports, and research staff who foster trusting relationships and help participants feel heard and valued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.