ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Postpartum ovarian vein thrombosis: plain CT with clinical indicators-diagnostic performance and clinical application.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostpartum ovarian vein thrombosis (POVT) is a rare but serious condition, often presenting with nonspecific symptoms and potentially leading to life-threatening complications such as pulmonary embolism. The utility of plain computed tomography (CT) in POVT remains unexplored.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 25 POVT patients and 27 postpartum controls with fever or abdominal pain. CT parameters, including plain and enhanced thrombus CT values and their ratios to the inferior vena cava (IVC), along with clinical markers, were measured and compared. Random forest models were constructed for discrimination and identifying concurrent thrombosis.
resultsCompared to controls, POVT patients showed significantly higher plain thrombus CT value (P-CT) and P-CT ratio, and lower enhanced thrombus CT value (E-CT) and E-CT ratio (all P < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated good discrimination performance for plain CT parameters (AUC: 0.773 for P-CT). For identifying concurrent thrombosis in other organs, D-dimer (AUC: 0.813) and P-CT (AUC: 0.807) were effective predictors. In repeated cross‑validation, the random forest models achieved mean AUCs of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.54-1.00) for classifying POVT and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.00-1.00) for identifying concurrent thrombosis.
conclusionsPlain CT can serve as a valuable initial screening tool for POVT. The integration of imaging and clinical parameters through machine learning models showed encouraging but preliminary discriminative ability (mean AUC 0.94 and 0.82, respectively), though with notable instability reflecting the modest sample size. These models may aid in early identification but require external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.