ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Reliable assessment of pollen quality in Chrysanthemum × morifolium: comparative evaluation of viability tests and germination media.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReliable evaluation of pollen quality is essential for successful hybridization and breeding programs in Chrysanthemum × morifolium. However, commonly used staining-based pollen viability tests do not always reflect functional pollen performance, and the relationship between pollen viability estimates and actual germination capacity remains insufficiently clarified in chrysanthemum.
resultsIn this study, the reliability of pollen viability and germination tests was evaluated using three chrysanthemum cultivars (Chic, Swan, and Barolo). Five pollen viability tests [iodine-potassium iodide (IKI), 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC), lactophenol blue (LCB), safranin (SFN), and acetocarmine (AST)] and eight in vitro germination assays consisting of four liquid and four semi solid media were compared using hanging-drop and Petri dish agar methods. In total, thirteen tests were evaluated under both fresh and heat-treated (80 °C for 48 h) pollen conditions, with 1.000 pollen grains analyzed per cultivar. Staining-based tests such as SFN, IKI, LCB, and AST produced high apparent viability values (76-98%), whereas the TTC test yielded markedly lower values (4-8%). Despite these high viability estimates, pollen germination percentages remained generally low across all media (0.1-7.3%). The highest germination performance was observed in polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based liquid media, particularly S-4 and S-1. PCA revealed an association between TTC viability results and germination success.
conclusionsThe results demonstrate a clear discrepancy between staining-based viability estimates and actual pollen germination capacity in chrysanthemum. The TTC test appeared to be the viability assay most closely associated with functional pollen performance under the tested conditions. TTC may provide a more functionally relevant estimate of pollen viability than staining methods such as IKI. The combined use of TTC-based viability testing and PEG-supported germination assays may therefore represent a promising approach for selecting highly functional pollen in chrysanthemum breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.