ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating orthokeratology lens fitting and the visual quality of artificial intelligence-fitted personalized lenses in myopic children with corneal asymmetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the orthokeratology (ortho-K) lens fitting and visual quality of artificial intelligence (AI) -fitted personalized lenses in myopic children with corneal asymmetry.This retrospective study included 139 children with corneal asymmetry who underwent ortho-K fitting, grouped according to conventional vision shaping treatment (VST) lenses (n = 53), corneal refractive therapy (CRT) lenses (n = 47), and AI-fitted personalized Optoshare Good Positioning (GP) lenses (n = 39). Pentacam-acquired anterior corneal images were used to calculate aberrations (root mean square total, root mean square higher-order aberration, and Zernike aberrations) and MATLAB was used to quantify lens decentration. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression were employed for analysis. After 1 month, the VST group's mean decentration (0.84 ± 0.35 mm) was significantly greater than that of the CRT (0.69 ± 0.22 mm, p = 0.023) and GP (0.60 ± 0.21 mm, p < 0.001) groups. All groups had increased aberrations; the VST group showed greater increases in coma Z
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.