ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
Physical activity level and its determinants in patients with cancer: a secondary analysis using a decision-tree approach.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLow physical activity is associated with poorer outcomes in patients with cancer. Understanding the determinants of physical activity is essential to designing targeted interventions. This study aimed to identify the determinants of total, aerobic, and resistance physical activity among patients with cancer using a decision-tree machine learning approach.
methodsThis secondary analysis pooled data from three harmonized cross-sectional studies conducted between 2018 and 2024, including adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with any cancer type and stage. Physical activity was assessed through validated self-report questionnaires and classified according to current guidelines. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were considered as potential correlates. Decision-tree models using the Classification and Regression Trees method were applied to identify predictors of adherence to aerobic and resistance exercise recommendations.
resultsA total of 1132 patients were included. Only 17.5% met aerobic activity recommendations (i.e., 150 min/week or ACSM guidelines), and 12.7% met resistance training recommendations (i.e., 2 times/week); 2.6% met both. cancer site emerged as the primary determinant of both aerobic and resistance activity. Occupational status, body mass index, and educational level further influenced adherence patterns. Neither cancer stage nor treatment timing significantly predicted physical activity behavior. Distinct determinants were identified for aerobic versus resistance exercise.
conclusionsAmong the factors included in the decision-tree models, physical activity was mainly influenced by cancer site and sociodemographic characteristics. Aerobic and resistance activities are governed by different predictors, underscoring the need for modality-specific assessment and intervention strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Tailored, cancer-specific supports that account for sociodemographic context and address barriers to both aerobic and resistance exercise are urgently needed to increase participation in physical activity and optimize survivorship outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42260253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.