ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Parental oral health literacy and oral health service utilisation amongst Myanmar migrant children in Thailand: a qualitative study.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early childhood caries and associated factors amongst Myanmar migrant preschool children in Thailand: a cross-sectional study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties testing of the Myanmar version of the oral health literacy questionnaire among Myanmar migrant mothers of preschool children.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of Oral Health Literacy Among Older Chinese Adults: A Path Analysis Based on Andersen's Behavioral Model.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to explore parental oral health literacy and oral health service utilisation amongst Myanmar migrant children in Thailand.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 23 Myanmar migrant parents residing in the central region of Thailand, each with at least one child aged 5-6 years. Data were collected through in-person, in-depth interviews conducted in the Myanmar language. Data analysis was performed via manual line-by-line inductive coding and content analysis.
resultsThree major categories were identified: (i) oral health knowledge and home practices: parents recognised the immediate consequences of oral disease; however, misconceptions about the importance of primary teeth and a variable understanding of the roles of diet and fluoride remained widespread; (ii) oral health-related information-seeking and utilisation: social media served as the primary source of information, with parents actively seeking information in response to particular concerns. Their ability to assess the reliability of online information varied considerably; and (iii) oral health service utilisation: many parents sought oral health care in a reactive manner rather than a preventive one. Financial constraints, work schedules, language barriers, immigration issues, and negative past experiences constituted significant barriers. Despite these barriers, parents expressed a strong willingness to seek care when their child's need was evident.
conclusionThis study provides insights into how migrant parents understand and manage their children's oral health, highlighting limited knowledge of primary teeth, reliance on social media for oral health information, and structural barriers to oral health service utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42260214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.