ArticleScientific reports2026
A generalisation study in deep learning-based segmentation of lower-limb muscles across different populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI detects signs of inflammatory arthritis in hand images.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and consistent segmentation of lower-limb muscles across different populations (e.g., children, young adults, and older individuals) remains challenging due to substantial anatomical differences. This study evaluated the performance of deep learning models for the automatic segmentation of lower-limb muscles in typically developed children (TDC). We present a novel investigation into their generalization ability across different cohorts (healthy young people (HY) and post-menopausal women (PMW)). Our focus was on the Attention-Feature-Fusion-Unet (AFFU) model, which incorporates a feature fusion module into U-Net. First, manual segmentation of T1-weighted images from TDC cohort was conducted by different operators and a reproducibility analysis was evaluated. Then a comparison study was carried out with UNet, UNet + + , and Attention UNet. The model AFFU achieved the best Dice Similarity Coefficient 0.86 and Relative Volume Error 0.09 on children cohort. It also significantly reduced the Hausdorff Distance and Average Symmetric Surface Distance by approximately 34% and 20%, respectively, compared to the baseline U-Net (p < 0.01). It can be observed that larger, regularly shaped muscles achieved higher segmentation accuracy, while smaller and irregular muscles posed difficulties. The experiment showed that a single type of cohort model training is not enough to improve the model generalisation ability. The best results in terms of generalisation were achieved with a training set of mixed multi-class cohorts and a complex model using attention mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.