ArticleNature medicine2026
Electronic cigarette use after smoking cessation and lung cancer risk.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have gained popularity as a less harmful alternative to conventional cigarettes, yet their associations with lung cancer risk after smoking cessation remain uncertain. Here we evaluated 4,524,895 adults with a conventional smoking history who participated in the Korean National Health Screening Program in 2018 (baseline), with prior records from 2012-2014. Participants were classified as current smokers, short-term quitters or long-term quitters, and followed up to December 2023. Daily e-cigarette use at baseline was used to define post-cessation e-cigarette use. Lung cancer incidence and lung cancer-specific death (LCSD) were assessed using multivariable Cox models. Over 24,182,543 person-years, 35,887 lung cancers and 12,807 LCSD events occurred. Compared with complete quitters, e-cigarette use after smoking cessation was associated with higher risks of lung cancer incidence (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.97) and LCSD (aHR 2.00, 95% CI 1.28-3.15). Associations were directionally consistent in short-term and long-term quitters and were prominent in the high-risk subgroup (incidence: aHR 1.91, 95% CI 1.44-2.53; LCSD: aHR 1.92, 95% CI 1.13-3.24). Although causality cannot be established, these findings suggest that e-cigarette use after smoking cessation may attenuate the benefits of complete cessation for lung cancer prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42260103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.