Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260097›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2026

Consciously detecting and recognizing a past visual word after its sensory trace is gone.

Daphné Rimsky Robert, Matteo Lisi, Kevin Nguy, Roxane Jannin, Thomas Hardy, Nathan Beraud, Claire Sergent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daphné Rimsky RobertIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center - UMR 8002 CNRS/Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France. drr@tuta.io.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-5152
Matteo LisiDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3554-385X
Kevin NguyIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center - UMR 8002 CNRS/Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Roxane JanninIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center - UMR 8002 CNRS/Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Thomas HardyIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center - UMR 8002 CNRS/Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Nathan BeraudIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center - UMR 8002 CNRS/Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8297-4746
Claire SergentIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center - UMR 8002 CNRS/Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-5780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What is the role of sensory processing in conscious perception? Current theories of consciousness are divided on this question. Some propose that conscious perception arises during the buildup of sensory representations. Others argue for a secondary process that broadcasts these representations to higher-level areas. This second view makes a counter-intuitive prediction: one could consciously perceive abstract representations untied to any low-level sensory feature. We tested this prediction by combining visual masking with retrospective cueing. We found that when visually masked words were followed by a semantically related auditory word, participants were better at detecting this past word and reporting its identity, but were strikingly unable to report its visual features (letter casing or position on screen). This suggests that retro-cueing can help a semantic representation reach awareness even after the associated sensory information has been masked. The mechanisms of conscious access might thus be largely independent of early sensory build-up.

Identifiers

PMID42260097
PMCPMC13658779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.