ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of early probiotic exposure with age at NEC onset in preterm Infants: A retrospective multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of probiotics for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants remains controversial. Specifically, whether the outcomes of infants with NEC are associated with prior probiotic administration remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the association between early supplementation with mixed-species probiotics and the timing of NEC onset as well as clinical outcomes in preterm infants who subsequently developed NEC. This retrospective study enrolled 216 preterm infants (gestational age < 35 weeks) diagnosed with stage II/III NEC from two hospitals in China. The patients were divided into a probiotics group and a nonprobiotics group. The timing of NEC onset, disease characteristics (intestinal perforation, surgery, mortality), and the occurrence of other preterm comorbidities were compared between the two groups. Among the infants who developed NEC, the median age at onset was observed to be later in the probiotic-exposed group compared with the unexposed group (22.5 days vs. 12 days). The probiotics group had a shorter duration of fasting after NEC onset (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of rates of surgery, intestinal perforation, mortality, shock, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), or extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR). Among infants who developed NEC, early mixed-species probiotic exposure was associated with later NEC onset. This association should be interpreted cautiously because probiotic exposure was non-protocolized and time-dependent. No clear evidence was observed for an association with reduced disease severity or lower rates of major complications, including surgery, bowel perforation, or mortality. These associational findings are exploratory and require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.