ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing life jacket detection for maritime search and rescue using YOLO models and illumination-robust preprocessing techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR) operations are often challenged by vast search zones, poor visibility, and extreme lighting conditions, especially during nighttime missions. This study investigates the use of computer vision and object detection algorithms to automate life jacket detection and improve SAR effectiveness. To address the absence of domain-specific datasets, a custom image dataset featuring multiple life jacket types was developed. A two-fold methodology was adopted: evaluating the performance of YOLO object detection models (versions 5 through 12) on the dataset, and incorporating advanced image preprocessing techniques to enhance detection under challenging lighting conditions. The results demonstrate that preprocessing significantly improves detection performance in both overexposed and underexposed scenarios. Among all evaluated models, YOLOv10 achieved the strongest combination of precision and real-time inference speed (43.9 FPS on Tesla T4 GPU), making it a promising candidate for time-sensitive rescue applications. While individual cells of Tables 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 show other detectors achieving higher precision under specific lighting × preprocessing combinations, YOLOv10 offers the best aggregate trade-off across the evaluated criteria. This work contributes a scalable benchmark solution for improving SAR outcomes by enabling faster and more reliable identification of individuals in distress at sea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.