ArticleScientific reports2026
Field strength and frequency-dependent effects of pulsed electric fields on soilborne nematodes, pathogens, and weeds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulsed electric field (PEF) technology is a non-chemical approach with potential to control soilborne agricultural pests. PEF disrupts cellular membranes through short, high-energy electrical pulses. Treatment efficacy depends on electric field strength, pulse frequency, and applicator design. Field strength reflects the intensity of the electric field driving electroporation, whereas energy density represents the cumulative dose delivered to the system, and pulse frequency determines how that dose is distributed over time. In this study, two soil-applied PEF applicators, vertical pins (VP) and parallel plates (PP), were evaluated for suppression of weeds, plant-parasitic nematodes, and soilborne pathogens. Numerical simulations showed that the PP configuration generated a more uniform electric field distribution than the VP design. Consistent with these predictions, the PP applicator provided greater biological suppression across target organisms. Cyperus esculentus biomass declined progressively with increasing energy density and was significantly reduced at ≥100 J cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.