Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260035›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Robust image quality evaluation in optical coherence tomography of skin using global, region-independent metrics.

Elnaz Babaee, Mehdi Boostani, Mostafa Charmi, Kamran Avanaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elnaz BabaeeRichard and Loan Hill Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mehdi BoostaniDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Dermatooncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary. mehdi_parsii@yahoo.com.
Mostafa CharmiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Kamran AvanakiRichard and Loan Hill Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. avanaki@uic.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a powerful imaging modality for visualizing tissue microstructures, but its utility is often limited by artifacts such as speckle, intensity decay, and blurring. While numerous image enhancement algorithms have been proposed to address these issues, the field lacks robust, objective metrics to consistently quantify image quality, hindering fair comparison and development of such methods. Existing metrics, such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), depend heavily on user-selected regions of interest, introducing substantial variability. In this work, we introduce a fully automated framework that segments OCT skin images into air, signal, and noise regions and defines three global image quality metrics: noise-free pixel ratio (NFPR), global SNR (gSNR), and global contrast (gCN). These metrics analyze the entire image without requiring ROI selection, enabling reproducible and user-independent evaluations that correlate with both acquisition parameters and human visual perception. Extensive validation on skin OCT datasets demonstrates that the proposed metrics provide more consistent and stable characterization of image quality compared to conventional ROI-based metrics under the tested conditions. These results suggest that the proposed framework can support objective evaluation of OCT image quality and facilitate the development and benchmarking of image enhancement methods.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSkinTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioImage enhancement evaluationImage quality metricsOCTOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID42260035
PMCPMC13490432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.