Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260014›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.

Raffaele d'Isa, Piotr Bebas, Michael H Parsons, Korneliusz Kurek, Rafal Stryjek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Killing behaviors in rodents: from predation to infanticide.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raffaele d'IsaInstitute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), Division of Neuroscience (DNS), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. disa.raffaele@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6114-6351
Piotr BebasDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Experimental Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-5892
Michael H ParsonsEffective Urban Rodent Ecology Knowledge Alliance (EUREKA), Centre for Urban Ecological Solutions (CUES), Houston, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0891-3771
Korneliusz KurekMasurian Centre for Biodiversity Research and Education, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Urwitałt, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6748-1425
Rafal StryjekInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. rstryjek@psych.pan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-9341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most peculiar behaviors of rodents is tail-rattling, a rapid vibration of the tail which can produce a rattling sound when performed against a hard surface. Tail-rattling is widespread across rodents, having been observed in 32 species from 19 genera, including Mus and Rattus. Rodent tail-rattling has been known from the eighteenth century, when it was described as part of the defensive behavior of the crested porcupine. From the 1940s, comparative psychologist John Scott systematically studied tail-rattling in laboratory mice, making it widely popular among laboratory researchers as one of the main components of the mouse agonistic ethogram. Currently, tail-rattling is interpreted almost exclusively as a threat display. However, historically, tail-rattling has been described in a great variety of different contexts, including intraspecies agonism, antipredator behavior, male-to-female courtship, female proceptive behavior, caressing by a human caregiver, social isolation, home-cage change, footshock-induced fear and decisional conflict. This wide range of contexts indicates that tail-rattling is not just a sign of aggressiveness, but can be associated with a set of emotions comprising anger, fear, distress, uncertainty, sexual arousal and physical pleasure. Notably, tail-rattling is expressed by rodents in emotional contexts of both negative and positive affective value. In the present article, firstly we provide a historical overview of rodent tail-rattling observations, starting from porcupines and ending with mice, covering a period from the 1770s to 2026. We then discuss what emotional state tail-rattling may express. Subsequently, we evaluate the possible functions of rodent tail-rattling. Additionally, we present our explanatory model of tail-rattling, the discharge model. Finally, we propose future directions for rodent tail-rattling research, including the employment of tail-rattling as a marker of animal welfare in laboratory and zoo rodents.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalRodentiaTailAnimalsFemaleMaleVibrationAgonistic behaviorComparative psychologyEmotion expressionEthologyMiceRatsRodentsTail-rattling

Identifiers

PMID42260014
PMCPMC13395898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.