ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Effectiveness of a behavioral weight management intervention by race, ethnicity, income, and education: a meta-analysis.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRacially and ethnically marginalized groups experience disproportionately high obesity rates, but are underrepresented in clinical trials of obesity treatments. Obesity treatments seem less effective for marginalized groups, but studies are characterized by small samples, clinic-based treatments, and little attention to socioeconomic position. We evaluated weight loss outcomes of a widely-available behavioral weight management program (Weight Watchers; WW) by race, ethnicity, income and education.
methodsWe performed an individual participant data meta-analysis of 11 WW intervention studies published from 2000-2025. T-tests compared weight loss between intervention and control participants within race, ethnicity, income and education subgroups. Among intervention participants, fixed effects multivariable regression estimated the odds of achieving a 5% weight loss across subgroups.
resultsHere we show that among 2972 participants (19% Non-Hispanic Black, 7% Hispanic/Latine; 30% <$50,000/y) and a mean (SD) weight of 96.2 (18.1) kg, WW interventions produce significantly greater weight loss than controls in all subgroups at 3, 6, and 12 months. Within the intervention group, Non-Hispanic Black participants are significantly less likely to experience a 5% weight loss than Non-Hispanic White participants at 3, 6, and 12 months, but there are no differences by income or education.
conclusionsA widely-available weight management program is more effective than controls for weight loss in all race, ethnicity, income, and education subgroups. However, the likelihood of clinically significant weight loss varies when comparing across racial and ethnic groups. These data can assist practitioners and patients when choosing evidence-based approaches to manage obesity among racially and ethnically marginalized groups.
Identifiers
42259951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.