Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42259945›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026

Reservoir placement and surgical considerations: A narrative review.

Augustus E Anderson Iv, Dev Shah, Maia Van Dyke M, Charles Klose C, Allen F Morey, Bryce A Baird

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Augustus E Anderson IvTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Dev ShahUrology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2571-7464
Maia Van Dyke MDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-7359
Charles Klose CDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Allen F MoreyUrology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, TX, USA.
Bryce A BairdUrology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, TX, USA. bryce.alden.baird@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir design and placement techniques has significantly impacted patient outcomes and surgical practices. Recent advancements in reservoir design have improved device safety, durability, and surgical adaptability, which has built on decades of innovation. Concurrently, surgical techniques have evolved to accommodate anatomical variations, reduce complications, and expand options for both traditional and ectopic reservoir placement. Novel approaches, such as high submuscular reservoir placement with counter-incision, exemplify the trend toward safer and more reproducible solutions in complex cases. By synthesizing these developments, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how patient-centered care and mastery of diverse techniques can optimize outcomes and address challenges in prosthetic urology.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.