ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimization of cotton two-ply yarn parameters to enhance tensile strength using the grey wolf optimization algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing the structural parameters of two-ply yarn is essential for achieving superior mechanical performance in textile applications. In this study, an intelligent hybrid framework combining Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) with the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) was developed to systematically optimize cotton two-ply yarn parameters with the aim of maximizing tenacity. Comparative modeling results demonstrated that the ANN significantly outperformed the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) model in terms of predictive accuracy and generalization ability, as confirmed by higher TGF values, thereby validating its suitability for integration within the ANN-GWO optimization scheme. The optimization process identified the optimal configuration as 1000 TPM twist for both single yarns, 790 TPM for the two-ply yarn twist, and a Z twist direction. Under these conditions, the cost function value improved markedly from - 0.4876 to - 0.9814, while tenacity increased substantially from 28.72 cN/tex to 35.81 cN/tex. Sensitivity analysis further revealed that the twist direction of the two-ply yarn was the most influential parameter, accounting for 32.61% of the variation in tenacity. Overall, the proposed ANN-GWO framework provides a robust, data-driven, and industry-relevant approach for the precise regulation and performance enhancement of two-ply yarns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.