ArticleScientific reports2026
Temporal changes in gene regulation during human tissue repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The response to injury involves a complex series of events, including cellular migration and proliferation, inflammatory processes, and tissue remodeling. The oral mucosa exhibits a more regenerative repair response that resolves with minimal scarring when compared to skin. To investigate mechanisms driving this differential healing response, we integrated gene expression data from adult human palate and skin wounds over seven days with transcription factor binding data and protein-protein interaction data to estimate sample-specific gene regulatory networks. Comparative analysis between unwounded palate and skin networks revealed tissue-specific transcription factor targeting and gene set co-expression. Upon injury, global network changes between tissues were divergent, indicating distinct gene regulatory programs. Gene regulatory analyses revealed that the acute response to injury is characterized by transcription factor mediated gene repression, followed by tissue-specific gene activation at later healing stages. Notably, a subset of palate-specific transcription factors previously linked to regeneration in model organisms correlated with gene targeting and expression during acute injury. Specifically, BATF3 promoted cell migration and re-epithelialization after injury, but not proliferation. In summary, these findings highlight the temporal dynamics of transcription factors in wound response between palate and skin and provide insights into the gene regulatory mechanisms governing regenerative and non-regenerative healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.