ArticleScientific reports2026
A distribution-level statistical framework for reliable pipeline leak detection using multi-domain signal analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DRQ-RTDETR: Degradation-Aware Detail Recovery and Query-Guided RT-DETR for Household Gas Facility Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and reliable detection of pipeline leaks is essential for ensuring operational safety and minimizing environmental and economic losses. In practice, however, pipeline monitoring signals are inherently non-stationary and strongly influenced by operating conditions, making robust leak detection challenging, particularly when labeled fault data are scarce or unavailable. This paper presents a statistically grounded, signal-processing-based framework for pipeline leak detection that operates without reliance on machine learning or deep learning models. Pipeline signals are represented using a compact multi-domain feature set integrating time-domain statistics, frequency-domain spectral descriptors, and time-frequency features derived from wavelet packet decomposition. Instead of monitoring pointwise feature deviations, pipeline condition is assessed through distribution-level comparison between feature sets extracted from sliding monitoring windows and a reference distribution constructed under normal operation. Multiple complementary two-sample statistics energy distance, maximum mean discrepancy, and Hotelling's [Formula: see text] statistic are employed to capture distinct aspects of distributional divergence and fused into a unified health indicator (HI). Leak detection is achieved by comparing this indicator against statistically derived thresholds obtained exclusively from normal-condition data, enabling automated detection with controlled false-alarm behavior. The proposed framework is validated using experimental acoustic emission data collected from pipelines conveying gas and water at pressure levels of 13 bar and 18 bar. Results demonstrate stable normal-state behavior with false-alarm rates below 1%, rapid leak detection within 1-2 samples after leak onset, and detection accuracy exceeding 99% across all operating scenarios. Permutation-based statistical significance analysis confirms strong detection confidence with p-values in the range of [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text], while robustness evaluation across more than 60 parameter configurations demonstrates consistent performance without operating-condition-specific tuning. The proposed approach provides an interpretable, data-efficient, and statistically rigorous solution for practical pipeline leak monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.