ArticleScientific reports2026
An adaptive oppositional grey wolf optimizer for complex engineering problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metaheuristic optimization algorithms are critical for solving complex, high-dimensional problems, however, their performance is frequently hindered by premature convergence, limited exploration capabilities, and an imbalance between search phases. While the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) has demonstrated considerable potential, its rigid linear control parameters and susceptibility to elite stagnation limit its scalability in highly deceptive landscapes. To overcome these critical drawbacks, this paper proposes the adaptive oppositional grey wolf optimizer (AOGWO), a robust and dynamically adaptive optimization framework. The proposed approach makes three primary contributions: (1) integrating a hybrid opposition-based learning (OBL) initialization framework to guarantee maximum initial spatial diversity, (2) implementing an adaptive cosine control strategy paired with a decaying Jumping Rate and Lévy flight perturbations to dynamically balance exploration and exploitation, and (3) proposing a highly targeted selective leading opposition (SLO) mechanism applied exclusively to the Alpha leader to prevent elite traps without incurring excessive computational overhead. The performance of AOGWO is evaluated using an extensive suite of 41 benchmark test functions (comprising the IEEE CEC2017 and CEC2022 suites) and seven challenging real-world engineering design problems. Comprehensive empirical results provide concrete data demonstrating AOGWO's competitive performance. Quantitatively, AOGWO achieved the best mean performance on 24 out of 29 CEC2017 functions and all 12 CEC2022 functions. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test further showed statistically significant improvements over most competing algorithms at p < 0.05, while the Friedman test ranked AOGWO first overall across the evaluated benchmark suites. In constrained engineering design problems, AOGWO also produced competitive optimal solutions while satisfying the prescribed constraints. These findings suggest that AOGWO is a promising process innovation to advance practical optimization tasks, promote economic productivity, and improve resource efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.