ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-driven optimization of alkali-activated sustainable pavement concrete incorporating agro-industrial wastes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of agro-industrial wastes into alkali-activated concrete (AAC) offers a sustainable alternative to traditional concrete pavement material, yet the synergistic effects of waste foundry sand (WFS) as a fine aggregate replacement and rice husk ash (RHA) as a partial binder replacement in ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)-based AAC designed for rigid pavement applications remain under-explored. This study investigates the machine learning (ML)-driven optimization of AAC, addressing a critical research gap in material synergy and predictive modeling. Experimental results indicate that increasing WFS (0-30%) and RHA (0-20%) reduces compressive strength (CS) to some extent; however, an optimized mix containing 20% WFS and 15% RHA achieved a 28-day CS satisfying pavement-quality concrete requirements while maintaining workability within acceptable limits. A comparative ML framework comprising six algorithms; Multiple Linear Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Support Vector Regression, and Gradient Boosting was developed and benchmarked to predict the CS of 330 experimental samples. The Random Forest model achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.