Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42259837›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026

Patient-specific modeling of G2/M cell cycle dynamics reveals prognostic dynamical regimes driven by copy number alterations.

Andrea Tonina, Alessandro Romanel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea ToninaDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Alessandro RomanelDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Trento, Italy. alessandro.romanel@unitn.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell cycle dysregulation is a hallmark of cancer and a major source of tumor heterogeneity. While large-scale cancer genomics studies have characterized recurrent copy number alterations affecting cell cycle regulators, how these alterations translate into patient-specific dynamical dysregulation remains poorly understood. Here, we develop a stochastic, human-specific model of the G2/M cell cycle transition and integrate somatic copy number alterations to generate patient-specific perturbations of cell cycle dynamics. Copy number profiles from breast cancer patients are quantitatively mapped to model components, enabling simulation of individualized G2/M transition behavior. Model simulations reveal that copy number alterations induce distinct dynamical regimes characterized by systematic shifts in transition timing and switching commitment. Importantly, model-derived dynamical metrics stratify patients into groups with significantly different overall survival, independently of age and molecular subtype. Patients exhibiting delayed or impaired G2/M transitions show improved survival probability, consistent with reduced proliferative capacity. These results demonstrate that mechanistic, stochastic modeling can transform static genomic alterations into clinically relevant dynamical phenotypes, highlighting the potential of systems-level approaches to bridge cancer genomics and functional tumor behavior.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsBreast NeoplasmsCell CycleComputer SimulationFemaleG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansModels, BiologicalPrognosisStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID42259837
PMCPMC13578713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.