ArticleScientific data2026
Re-curating a 90-year ecological data collection from an Australian arid zone enclosure according to FAIR principles.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes the re-curation of a 90-year legacy data collection from the TGB Osborn Vegetation Reserve in South Australia, first published by Dr Russ Sinclair in an open digital repository in 2014. Data collections such as this are rare, unrepeatable, and provide benchmarks against which the otherwise changing landscape can be measured. The work was necessitated by increasing sophistication in data repository systems, better understanding of the factors that make data reusable, demands of users, and the death of a key knowledge-holder. Updating a data resource that adhered to data standards of a decade ago, however, was not trivial. The data required cleaning and aligning with community standard vocabularies, with particular attention to the creation of comprehensive metadata. The lack of a knowledgeable custodian highlighted the need for an active relationship between the data creators and the repository. The updated dataset is now compliant with the FAIR Data Principles and provides an invaluable resource for the understanding and sustainable use of arid rangelands worldwide.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.