ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2026
Prevalence and National Trends in Prenatal Wildfire Smoke Exposure Among Live Births.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWildfire smoke is an increasing source of pollution in the United States and can affect communities far from active fires. The developing fetus is vulnerable to prenatal smoke exposure, yet existing evidence is focused on a few western states. This population-based retrospective cohort study documents national patterns and trends in prenatal wildfire smoke exposure across geographic and sociodemographic groups.
methodsSatellite-based wildfire smoke plumes were combined with restricted-use vital statistics microdata for 34,440,915 live births in the contiguous United States from 2012-2020. Prenatal exposure was measured as the number of days during gestation with medium or heavy wildfire smoke in the mother's county of residence. Changes in median smoke-days, the share of infants prenatally exposed to ≥7 smoke-days, and wildfire-attributed PM
results25.5 million infants (74.2%) had prenatal smoke exposure. 4.3 million (22.7%) births had at least 7 days of exposure in 2016-2020, a significant increase from 2012-2015 (p<0.001). Median exposure significantly increased from 0.6 days in 2012-2015 to 2.0 days in 2016-2020 (p<0.001). Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native infants, infants living in rural counties, and states in the Upper and Western Midwest and Rocky Mountains faced the highest prenatal exposures.
conclusionsPrenatal wildfire smoke exposure is widespread, increasing, and not confined to regions near active fires. These findings highlight a growing national public health concern and underscore the need for preparedness, targeted prevention, and risk-appropriate care across communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.