ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026
Pituitary metastasis revisited: a retrospective single-center experience with diagnostic challenges and surgical nuances. Illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPituitary metastases represent approximately 1% of all pituitary tumors and are associated with a poor prognosis. Although rare, early diagnosis and treatment are critical to limit rapid clinical decline. Because of their rarity, published data remain limited. The authors report their institutional experience at The Ottawa Hospital, focusing on clinical and radiological presentation, surgical management, adjuvant therapy, and outcomes. OBSERVATIONS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the cases of adult patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for pituitary metastases between 2016 and 2025. Inclusion criteria were histopathological confirmation and complete clinical data. Four patients (mean age 57 years) were identified; 3 had known primary malignancies. All of the patients had cranial nerve (CN) deficits. Headache was the most common symptom, followed by visual disturbance; diabetes insipidus occurred in 2 patients. Imaging showed bone erosion in all cases and cavernous sinus invasion in 1 patient. All patients underwent endoscopic resection. Tumors were adherent and highly vascular, requiring meticulous microsurgical dissection and hemostatic agents. Postoperative complications were minimal, with one CSF leak. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. CN improvement occurred in 3 patients. Three patients died, with a mean survival of 6.3 months postdiagnosis. LESSONS: Pituitary metastases are associated with rapid clinical deterioration and poor survival. Multidisciplinary management and further research are needed to improve outcomes. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE26115.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.